Immigration to Australia

When it comes to Australia, migration seekers often think of the place as one vast area where they can easily move into. However, some experts say that while the country is indeed big (it is one continent after all), it can, in fact, carry only so many people. And it seems that Australians themselves are saying that there is no more room left in the country.

This would seem to be the case if one looks into the latest survey conducted to get Australians' opinions on various immigration issues. According to the survey conducted by AustraliaScan, an independent survey firm, a large percentage of the 2000 people they surveyed actually agreed that its about time to limit migration into the country. The firm noted that the response was almost as high as the anti-immigration sentiments of the late 90's

However, experts said that these new anti immigration sentiments are actually far different from those sentiments in the past. One thing of note is that the earlier sentiments were mainly characterized by racist tones mainly fanned by the popularity of radical politician Pauline Hanson. On the other hand, experts say that, far from those radical perceptions, the current attitude of Australians with regards to migration definitely has a basis

So, are Australians correct in thinking that there is no more room left for people who want to move into the country? To answer that, it would be a good idea to look into the reasons put forward by those who have responded to the question. One of these is that there are only so much to support the country's population sustainably.

The truth of the matter is, while the country is indeed very large, it only has a limited amount of resources. As the country's population grows larger, these resources in turn get used much quicker. And with the rate at which Australia's population is growing (immigration being one of the leading causes of the increase), it is likely that these resources will get used up much sooner than expected.

And it still doesn't end there. Another threat that a growing population brings forth is pollution. Australians fear that with the increase in people in the country, pollution will also go up much faster. This will be detrimental, not only to the population's health but also to the fragile environment of the continent as well. This will also hasten the land into becoming unlivable.

Another thing that many Australians are considering with regards to the matter of limiting immigration numbers is security. As it turns out, global terrorism is still much of a threat that the country needs to deal with. And along with this, there are still other threats that needs to be dealt with, such as international crime. Thus, many people see immigration cuts as a way in combating these.

Despite these valid points, it is unlikely that the immigration question will be settled soon, what with all the other things that needs to be considered. And for the meantime, Australians cross their fingers and hope that the country can still support its people a little bit longer.

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/destinations-articles/australians-fear-negative-effect-of-immigration-2716943.html

PrincipalVisas provides advice and assistance on applying for an Australia visas. Use this website to find all the information and guidance you will need when visiting Australia. It also contain general Australia Immigration Information about different types of visa and category of travelers. Try our online visa application service at http://www.principalvisas.com and start a new life in Australia.

When a person is seeking to start the immigration process into a new nation like Australia, there are many steps they take to help their efforts. They seek online sources of information to start learning about the various laws that influence immigration. They might order books specific in the various visas which can be issued to people looking for immigration access to the country. They may even contact the Australian government in order to access the migration department particularly in order to discover the most they can before starting the application process. The issue these people will face is that several of the government specialists they are seeking help from do not have the time for personal consultation when having to deal with the thousands seeking entry into the nation.

When you require aid in completing the migration procedure, no source is more valuable to access than the services of an Immigration Agent. With an Immigration Agent you'll find a professional individual who specializes in the field of migration and is looking to provide you with the one-on-one personal service so many individuals desire. When you make use of the experience of an Immigration Agent the first benefit you get is access to the amazing amount of knowledge they possess. Australia has close to one hundred and forty different immigration visas available for individuals to apply to. Each one of these visas has different requirements to qualify an individual together with different laws for them to follow. An Immigration agent is an invaluable tool to help you in filtering through all of these visas and discovering the best one to fit your specific condition.

Once you have acquired the knowledge you need by using the Immigration Agent, the next step is found with the immigration application procedure.

The immigration procedure gets no easier with the application as this is the main document that would dictate if you originally qualify for the visa you're applying to. When you gain access to the expertise of an Immigration Agent you would discover a person that can offer you with the greatest opportunity to succeed in migration. These people are aware of the various red flags which are noticed by the immigration department that quickly puts a denial on your application. Many people innocently make these red flag mistakes and are forced to begin the procedure over again with a red flag now attached to their name. An Immigration Agent can get your application processed rapidly and without the red flag warnings that cause you to fail in your immigration attempt.

The immigration procedure is bombarded by huge quantities of info, laws and restrictions which hinder the immigration efforts of the person.

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/travel-tips-articles/achieving-immigration-success-with-the-help-of-an-immigration-agent-2916189.html

Are you interested in moving to Australia? Looking for the best migration agent Brisbane? Packed with helpful resources http://boseaustralia.com.au/ is one of the best migration agent you can find in Australia. Visit the site to get more information.

Farhad Arian

Source: South Asia Times

On Monday, 17 January 2011, the Australian Immigration Minister, Chris Bowen signed an agreement with the Afghan Refugee and Repatriation Minister, Jamaher Anwary, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Richard Towel. Signing this agreement is part of Australia's broader attempts for the intention of decreasing illegal immigrants to Australia. This agreement particularly provides the Australian government with an exceptional opportunity to successfully respond to the challenge of Afghan asylum seekers to further send those back home who fail to pass the refugee test.

Despite the promises given by the Australian government in terms of helping the Afghan government to improve passport system, funding a housing project outside Kabul, and providing skills training to Afghans, the government of Afghanistan, with signing this agreement, has ignored the fact that it is no longer capable of protecting Afghan returnees. However, neither the government of Australia nor the Afghan government has paid attention to this issue that the sustainable return of those Afghans not considered genuine refugees to Afghanistan is not a realistic approach to deal with the challenge of Afghan asylum seekers.

First of all, singing such an agreement, that allows for the forced return of those Afghans who do not pass the refugee test, is in contrary to the international human rights obligations of the Australian government. As a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention, Australia is obliged to ensure that people who meet the definition of refugee under the Convention are not sent back to a country where their life or freedom is threatened. As well, Australia has signed the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the 1984 Convention Against Torture (CAT), and the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), obliging Australia to not return people who face a real risk of violation of human rights even if they do not meet the definition of refugee under the 1951 Refugee Convention. As such, signing to further the implementation of this agreement indicates that the Australian government has neither paid attention to its international human rights obligations nor taken serious the life and freedom of the returned Afghan asylum seekers.

In addition to the failure of the Australian government in respecting its international human rights obligations, the government of Afghanistan, with signing such an agreement for returning Afghan asylum seekers, has entirely ignored the fact that the returnees neither in the southern and eastern regions of Afghanistan nor in other parts of the country are safe due to the Taliban-led insurgency. In particular, the government of Afghanistan has denied the fact that all people who leave Afghanistan and seek for overseas asylum are those who cannot return due to serious security concerns to further because of their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, and political opinion. For example, Professor William Maley from the Australian National University and an expert on Afghanistan and immigration issues points out that the life and freedom of ethnic Hazaras are mostly at risk if they are forced to go back Afghanistan. Thus, regardless of incapability of protecting the returnees, the government of Afghanistan has signed the agreement with the Australian government, demonstrating the carelessness of the Afghan government in protecting the lives and freedoms of its citizens.

Furthermore, regardless of few achievements in improving human rights institutions in the post-2001 era, the Afghan government has failed to systematically protect human rights of the people of Afghanistan. In other words, in spite of signing the major international human rights treaties, the Afghan government has paid less attention in protecting human rights of its citizens. As such, the Afghan Immigration Minister has signed the agreement for returning Afghan asylum seekers with no intention of caring about the protection and improvement of the basic rights of the returnees.

Therefore, signing such an agreement is another step towards violating human rights of Afghan citizens rather than guaranteeing their rights and freedoms because the government of Afghanistan no longer believes in human rights. More specifically, signing such a deal obviously indicates that respect for human rights is not a policy-priority for the Afghan government; unless it did not agree with the Australian government for returning Afghan asylum seekers to a country where respect for the dignity and rights of the people is like a dream that have never come true.

Finally, there is no guarantee that the agreement on deportation of failed Afghan asylum seekers is based on reliable and balanced security assessments of the situation in Afghanistan. As Professor William Maley points out, the security expertise of Australian officials for the purpose of returning failed Afghan asylum seekers is partly doubtful. Likewise, Paul Power, the Chief Executive of the Refugee Council of Australia, points out that even if the returned asylum seekers in Afghanistan are not so much under the threats caused by the government, they will be facing serious threats from the people or groups who are not under the control of the government.

Meanwhile, The Afghan government has signed the agreement without undertaking any security expertise assessments; otherwise the deteriorated security situation in Afghanistan does not allow the Afghan government to agree with the Australian government for returning Afghan asylum seekers. As a result, this agreement is neither prepared based on reliable security assessments in Afghanistan nor pays attention to the security risks that might threaten the Afghan returnees.

To conclude, the 17 January agreement on returning Afghan asylum seekers between the Australian Immigration Minister and the Afghan Refugee Minister is an agreement that is in contrary to the principles of human rights to further violates Australian as well as Afghanistan international human rights obligations. While the agreement ignores the deteriorated security situation in Afghanistan, it is a deal that is not prepared based on reliable and balanced security expertise assessments. In particular, while the agreement is technically an achievement for the Australian government, it does not pay attention to the security concerns of Afghan asylum seekers who do not pass the refugee test in Australia. By signing such a violating human rights agreement, the government of Afghanistan once again proves that it does not value the lives and freedoms of its citizens whether they are at risk or under uncertain security threats.

Tuesday, January 20, 2011

References

Australian Human Rights Commission, (2011), "Asylum Seekers and Refugees", Australian Human Rights Commission. Retrieved January 18, 2011 from www.hreoc.gov.au.

Cronin, D. (2011), "Afghan Deal May Send People Back to Danger", The Canberra Times. Retrieved January 18, 2011 from www.canberratimes.com.au.

Cronin, D. (2011), "Deal to Return Afghan Asylum Seekers", The Canberra Times. Retrieved January 17, 2011 from www.canberratimes.com.au.

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/politics-articles/deportation-of-afghan-asylum-seekers-from-australia-4114344.html

Farhad Arian is a former Deputy Director of the Office of Human Rights and Women's International Affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Afghanistan. Prior to joining the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, he was a Legal Consultant to the General-Directorate of the National Radio & Television of Afghanistan. Farhad Arian is currently undertaking a Master of Arts in International Affairs at the Australian National University (ANU).

Has Australia Got it all Wrong with the Boat Refugees?

Australia has a lot of problems with refugees arriving on boats from Asian countries. They have tried many costly ways to prevent them coming, and if they get here try to process them offshore to avoid other issues.

The would be immigrants show a lot of courage and drive to even attempt the long journey in small boats and I wonder why Australia would try so hard to deter people that would surely be such good citizens. Obviously we do not want criminals entering Australia but they would be more likely to arrive by plane than risk a perilous boat voyage.

The illegal immigrants are often held for months or longer while the authorities decide whether they are genuine refugees or undesirables which causes a lot of distress to the people and a lot of expense to the nation. Have we got it all wrong?

Maybe we should be attacking the problem in a new way. What if Australia decided that these courageous people are very desirable immigrants and allowed them much easier and quicker access to our country and used other means to protect us from undesirables and criminals.

Perhaps we could prevent these immigrants from becoming naturalised for five or more years and if they were convicted of any crime before being naturalised, immediately deport them back to the country they came from.

There would probably not be any trouble in the camps housing the immigrants as they would be processed quickly and humanely but if there was trouble surely the culprits could be deported on the next plane available. People rioting and burning cars and buildings would not be tolerated and how many would attempt to if they knew the consequence would be immediate deportation.

Many people have used the refugee problem to advance their own causes with over simplified solutions to the problem of the boat people. Statements like "Meet the boats and turn them around and make them go back." Desperate people will not willingly turn back and how do you force them. In the past the boats have been deliberately sunk by the crew. Do we let them drown? Do we shoot them?

There could be reasons that some solutions would not work but we need some new ideas on a way to solve the problem as we are getting it wrong now. Australia could welcome these immigrants as people that would assimilate into our way of life, not try to change our ways and customs as some other arrivals do. It would be great if we could deport some of our home grown criminals wouldn't it.

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/politics-articles/has-australia-got-it-all-wrong-with-the-boat-refugees-4435757.html

Australian author. Has experience in the building & service industries, firefighting and Sharetrading has 4 websites,

www.homeremediescuresite.com, www.healthyfastweightlosssite.com www.affiliatesmarketinginternet.com www.moneymakersclub.co

.Plays golf & lawn bowls Loves travel, cruises & family

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/education-articles/employer-nomination-scheme-under-australian-immigration-system-4550534.html